The Application of Bandura’s Social Learning Theory in Education

Social Learning Theory: Albert Bandura

People’s learning process has intrigued teachers and psychologists for hundreds of years, with the initial scientific learning research dating back to the late 19th century.
In the following years, we experienced a significant rise in attention towards learning models and philosophies, as numerous psychologists engaged in research efforts to comprehend how children acquire, interpret, and preserve knowledge and abilities in their learning process.
In this piece, we will examine one such learning model – Bandura’s theory on social learning.

What is Social Learning Theory?

The concept of social learning theory is that humans acquire knowledge by watching and mimicking the actions demonstrated by others. Bandura called this occurrence observational learning. Simply put, it is not mandatory to have a firsthand experience to learn something.

Observational learning doesn’t primarily demand a live demo (like a real person exhibiting or showing the behavior). It can also be observed from characters, whether real or imaginary, in films, TV shows, video games, and so forth.
Indeed, observational learning isn’t restricted to mere visual understanding; it can likewise happen through oral directions or by listening to someone illustrate or explain how a particular thing is performed.

What do we need to know about Social Learning Theory?

  • How would you define the social learning theory? The concept of social learning theory suggests that actions can be learned via observation, imitation, and modeling.
  • Who proposed this idea? This theory was created by Albert Bandura, who conducted some well-known studies called the Bobo doll experiments.
  • Does this theory connect with other theories? The principles claimed by Ivan Pavlov and B.F. Skinner, the theorists of classical and operant conditioning, were expanded upon by Bandura.
  • What key factors does the social learning theory entail? There are four key elements Bandura mapped out that are necessary for successful observational learning.
  • How can this theory be implemented in our education system? The social learning theory has been considered a potent tool by educators for teaching, inspiring students, and managing conduct.
  • Have there been any critiques regarding this theory? Some have questioned the theory of Bandura because of its constraints and confined perspective.
Absolutely, we can delve deeper into each of these aspects to obtain a more profound comprehension of the social learning theory.

Who Developed Social Learning Theory?

The Social Learning theory was formulated by Albert Bandura, a renowned psychologist from Canada.

Albert Bandura held the belief that all behaviors are shaped not through genetics, but via social imitation. During the early part of the 1960s, Bandura initiated a sequence of notable investigations known as the Bobo doll experiments, which eventually contributed to the formulation of his theory. This theory was made public in the year 1977.

As an integral part of these experiments, a set of children were separately exposed to an adult role model. This role model exhibited both verbal and physical aggression towards a Bobo doll.
Once these children were given the opportunity to play with the Bobo doll on their own, a substantial number of them replicated and reproduced the actions they had observed previously.
This experiment was conducted once again at a later stage, but with a notable difference this time around. The adult role model was either praised or penalised for the aggressive behaviour exhibited.
The findings of these experiments indicated that children are susceptible to influence and can learn from monitoring and observing the conduct of others.
Indeed, these observations also brought to light that behaviors that are positively reinforced or rewarded have a higher tendency to be replicated, while behaviors that are reprimanded or chastised are less likely to reoccur.

What Other Theories are Linked to Social Learning Theory?

Absolutely, the Social Learning Theory draws heavily from the foundational principles of Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning as well as Skinner’s Operant Conditioning. These theories both emphasize the impact of reward, punishment, and learning through observation on behavior.

Bandura’s theory of social learning is typically associated with behavioral learning theories, which emphasize the notion that all human behaviors are developed through conditioning and interactions with the external world.
The behavioralists hold the view that all human beings, regardless of their backgrounds or abilities, can be trained to execute any task provided the right environment and conditioning are in place.
Bandura’s social learning theory concedes with the behaviorist theories of classical and operant conditioning proposed by psychologists Ivan Pavlov and B.F. Skinner respectively.
Nevertheless, he posits that direct reinforcement cannot explain all instances of learning since children and adults frequently learn things without having a direct experience with it and without displaying their newly acquired behaviors.
Take for instance, a child who hasn’t ridden a bike before will know that they need to sit on the seat and pedal to make the bike move.
This child would have acquired this particular behavior by watching someone else demonstrate it.
This model could be another child or an adult from their surroundings, or potentially even an animated character on television.

 

Bandura, influenced by these observations, incorporated two distinct concepts when crafting his theory:

  • Learning of behavior happens from our surroundings via observational learning.

  • There are psychological elements at play which dictate whether a new behavior is learned or not.

Indeed, not all observed behaviors are imitated. Recognizing this, Bandura pinpointed four crucial elements for successful observational learning.

What are the 4 Elements of Social Learning Theory?

  • Attention: It is paramount that the learning material is engaging enough to sustain a student’s attention.
  • Retention: Students should have the mental capacity to recall what they’ve observed or heard.
  • Reproduction: It’s vital to allow students adequate time to practice and replicate the behavior they’ve observed.
  • Motivation: The student must also perceive a tangible benefit in the new behavior in order for it to be successfully integrated over the long term.
Absolutely, attention plays a pivotal role:
For a behavior to be observed and potentially imitated, the person observing must initially perceive the behavior and concentrate their focus on it. If the behavior fails to captivate the attention of the observer, or if they become sidetracked, the likelihood of the behavior being retained and reproduced at a future point diminishes.
Retention: The observer needs to be capable of remembering and storing in memory the behavior that has been observed, with the intention of referencing it in the future. Even if the behavior is imitated shortly after its observance, potent memory skills are still required. A myriad of factors can affect a student’s ability to retain information.
Reproduction: This involves mimicking the behavior initially observed. The ability of the observer to reproduce the behavior is contingent on whether the behavior was retained post-observation. That said, retention isn’t the sole factor here – a person’s physical abilities might also limit their capacity to reproduce the behavior.
Motivation: For a behavior to be reproduced, the observer must possess the motivation to do so. This motivation can stem from within (intrinsic), or from outside factors (extrinsic). Reinforcement and punishment are integral to motivation — observers are more prone to imitate a behavior if it leads to a favorable outcome.
The element of motivation can also be fueled when observers see others being rewarded for the same behavior. Through this observational learning, individuals are encouraged to replicate the rewarded behavior.
Absolutely correct. A person’s self-efficacy, or their conviction in their own ability to successfully replicate the behavior, can significantly influence their level of motivation. If an individual believes they have the skills and ability to perform a task or behavior effectively, they are more likely to be motivated to make an attempt. This perception of self-efficacy plays a crucial role in both the initiation and persistence of behavior.

How can Social Learning Theory be Applied in the Classroom?

Undoubtedly, as educators, our primary aim is to facilitate the success of our students by fostering their learning to their fullest capacity. The methodologies we adopt for teaching, the tactics we utilize, and the environment we cultivate within our classrooms are all instrumental in shaping the teaching-learning process.

Certainly! Here are several strategies for how we can integrate Bandura’s social learning theory into our teaching methodology in the classroom.

        Behavior

Indeed, effective classroom management is crucial to promoting thriving teaching and learning environment. Lack of it can quickly lead to disorder, disrupting both the educator and the pupils.
One can leverage Bandura’s social learning theory in the classroom to foster and instruct preferred behaviors via the application of positive reinforcements and rewards.
For instance, a student recognized for politely requesting to contribute in a dialogue is more inclined to replicate this mannerism. Moreover, classmates will model this action, observing that the conduct prompted a positive response.
On the other hand, a pupil reproached for unwanted conduct is less prone to reiterate it. Their classmates, too, will strive to steer clear of the negative repercussion associated with mimicking such behavior.

        Teaching

As mentioned before, a fundamental condition for observational learning to succeed is that the observer is attentive to the conduct being exhibited.
Hence, to effectively demonstrate or model a certain behavior to our students, it is of utmost importance that we secure their complete attention. Making sure that the learning materials are appropriate for their comprehension level and are as engaging as possible will assist in maintaining students’ attention.
Retention of the exhibited behavior or disseminated information is also a key factor in successful learning. As we all know, students have varied learning styles.
One of the methods we can implement to help our students remember information and behaviors is by integrating a variety of activities into our lessons. Utilizing a multisensory teaching strategy aids in enhancing retention.
For instance, while delivering a lecture orally, we can resort to visual stimuli to bolster the information.

        Motivating Students

Indeed, Bandura elucidated that for observational learning to bear fruit, the observer must be driven to replicate the observed behavior.
Research has indicated that educators who exhibit enthusiasm and passion in their teaching can motivate learners, as students are inclined to emulate their teacher’s conduct.
Teachers can stimulate learners extrinsically via positive reinforcement and rewards. Besides, they can also help amplify a learner’s internal motivation and self-efficacy through verbal persuasion, positive reinforcement, and constructive feedback.
Bandura’s self-efficacy theory is deeply rooted in the social learning hypothesis. If a learner is confident and believes in their capability to replicate a certain conduct, they are more inclined to make the attempt and succeed.
On the contrary, if a learner lacks self-confidence and is in doubt about their proficiency in executing a task, they are less likely to put diligent effort into the task and might ultimately fall short.

As educators, our responsibility includes discovering diverse methods to motivate our learners effectively.

        Pair and Group Work

Certainly, in our classrooms, acquiring knowledge isn’t limited to students observing their educator.
Learning happens via observing their classmates as well, which is why incorporating pair work and group work in the classroom can yield numerous benefits.
For instance, matching a more advanced student with one who is struggling enables peer coaching to transpire.
This is a highly resourceful and effective tactic deployed in contemporary classrooms. Students are often more likely to pay heed to their classmates than to another adult.
When steering group work, a teacher might position a less driven student in a group with a highly motivated one. The goal is that the motivated student’s influence will inspire the other to partake in some responsibility, assisting the unmotivated student to learn.
Every group member can serve as a model, and the group members can acquire knowledge via observing their peers’ behaviors and attitudes.

        Criticisms of Social Learning Theory

Certainly, despite its commendation for providing an alternative perspective on how learning transpires, social learning theory is not flawless and has attracted critique from those who deem that it has its constraints.
Many theorists argue that it delivers too limited a viewpoint, neglecting significant environmental influences and factors like socio-economic status.
Social learning theory implies that a person’s behavior and actions are predicated upon societal norms and overlooks the concept of personal accountability.
Unfortunately, this theory also neglects the role of biological factors, like genetics. Biogenetic pundits argue that some behaviors are, in fact, partially inherited. This defect in the social learning theory neglects the nature aspect of the “nature versus nurture” debate, potentially offering an incomplete understanding of behavior and learning.

Conclusion

Indeed, the social learning theory does hold a significant position in our educational infrastructure and bestows a more profound understanding of our students’ learning process.
However, it’s also vital for educators to recognize that if strategies are not executed rightly or applied erratically, they are unlikely to yield desired results.
It must also be acknowledged that what works for some students may not work for others, irrespective of the level of positive reinforcement or punishment given. There is no denying that countless external factors influence a student’s inclination and capability to learn.

One valuable insight that the social learning theory shares is the vital role that observation plays in shaping the knowledge, behavior, and attitudes of our students.

Therefore, educators need to exemplify remarkable role models and ensure they are inclusive, inspiring, and compassionate towards their students. Being a positive influence and setting a commendable example can definitely have a substantial influence on our students’ learning journey.

Add Comment